Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics

An exciting new development from Cambridge Journals

Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics

Implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) in low- and middle-income countries

Home / Technological advances / Implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) in low- and middle-income countries

Implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) in low- and middle-income countries

Posted on
19 September 2016
by Manjinder Sandhu

This blog post was written by Manjinder Sandhu and Elizabeth Young

Electronic health records (EHRs) can produce invaluable data to inform health care decisions and national and regional health planning. Coupled with advances in digital connectivity, EHRs have the potential to revolutionise health care—providing a framework for disease surveillance and response to epidemics, assessing therapeutic strategies, and informing health resource allocation.

EHRs are longitudinal electronic medical records, which are securely stored and shared, and can be accessed by multiple authorised users. The successful introduction of an EHR system depends on consistent electronic data entry at the point of care by clinical staff, supported by skilled information technology professionals. This creates a rich, robust, life-long health record which—if accessible at health interfaces—can improve patient care, as well as making it safer and more efficient.

Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are facing a double burden of disease: an increase in non-communicable diseases on top of an existing high prevalence of infectious diseases. Likewise, the number of individuals living with multiple co-morbidities, requiring long-term management, is rising. Thus, stretched and often under-resourced health care systems are facing increasing demands and rising costs. In this context, EHRs could offer a more efficient way to support health care provision and planning in LMICs.

EHR implementation coupled with regional digital networks can: 1) enhance access to medical information—providing a mechanism to centralise or regionalise specialist clinical decision-making; 2) reduce clinical errors, such as clinical warnings to inform prescribing; 3) facilitate the management of a range of diseases and interpretation of clinical and biochemical results; and 4) provide a mechanism for clinical reminders for disease screening and follow-up. For clinical staff, dealing with large volumes of patients with multiple complex morbidities, such support and efficiency could substantially improve patient outcomes.

For governments, EHR systems can provide routine data collection for enhanced disease surveillance and enable accurate evaluation of health care providers and staff. Continuous processing of EHR data has the potential to provide near-real time information which can expedite outbreak detection and disease surveillance. These frameworks could provide an invaluable platform for clinical observational and interventional research. Likewise, capture of prescription and diagnostic trends can support pharmacovigilence and antibiotic stewardship activities. For health system planning, EHRs can facilitate assessment of health service coverage, efficiency and quality, assisting evidence-based decision-making for resource allocation.

Although implementing EHRs is a substantial undertaking, there is evidence of successful EHR implementation. However, few studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of EHRs at the national level, even in high-income countries with wide implementation. Evaluations that do exist have focused on smaller implementation programmes such as primary care settings or hospital sub-specialiaties, or have used modelling approaches. Importantly, for any EHR development programme, it will be essential to carefully define an evaluation framework that assesses both the success of implementation and the subsequent improvements in patient care. These steps will help capture the full potential of EHRs to facilitate and improve health care and health research in a global context.

Studies suggest that, whilst successful implementation of EHRs requires high upfront costs for the installation of EHR infrastructure and staff training, the return on such investment may be substantial in the long-term. Indeed, building digital frameworks for a national EHR system, including large-scale computational infrastructure, could also empower local government, academic, and research institutions, as well as accelerate and facilitate a range of commercial sectors, including high-performance computing, cloud infrastructure, and the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Innovation through public-private partnership models could also reduce costs for implementation and management of EHRs. These approaches could provide the foundation for a digital future for LMICS.

Infectious DiseasesNon-communicable DiseasesTechnological advances tags: disease surveillance / Electronic health records / electronic medical records / health systems / implementation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

  • Rethinking clinical outcome markers in multimorbidity
  • ICPD 25: accelerating the promise or just holding ground?
  • Genomic studies in Africa: an opportunity to leverage existing observational data for causal inference
  • Most genetic studies use only white participants – this will lead to greater health inequality
  • RxScanner™: Making medicines safe globally

Archives

  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015

Categories

  • Capacity Building
  • Genetics
  • Global Health
  • Indigenous People
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Journal
  • Non-communicable Diseases
  • Technological advances

Tags

Africa antiretrovirals APCDR blood pressure Brown Capacity building Child health CRONICAS diabetes Ebola Electronic health records epidemiology genetic diversity genetics genomics GHEG global health H3Africa health systems HIV HIV/AIDS human health hypertension India Indigenous health infectious diseases intervention journal LMICs Longitudinal Population-Based studies Low- and middle-income countries Malaria Mental Health NCDs PacBio populations Pregnancy Sandhu Sierra Leone South Africa sub-saharan Africa Women in Global Health World AIDS Day Zoonoses zoonotic
© Copyright 2015 Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press