Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics

An exciting new development from Cambridge Journals

Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics

Kennewick Man: Solving a Scientific Controversy

Home / Genetics / Kennewick Man: Solving a Scientific Controversy

Kennewick Man: Solving a Scientific Controversy

Posted on
8 September 2015
by Uffe Wilken

In mid-June 2015, researchers from Denmark and the US announced the much anticipated results of their genetic analyses of the remains of Kennewick Man. Using genetics, scientists have finally resolved the long-standing and much-disputed mystery regarding his origins. This illustrates the pivotal role of scientific and technological advances in understanding population history and genetics, with applications at a scientific and cultural level.

The Kennewick Man: Japanese, Polynesian, European or Native American?

When the skeleton of the Kennewick Man was discovered in 1996 in Washington State, initial cranial analysis suggested that he was a historic-period Euro-American. Subsequent radiocarbon dating estimated that the bones were around 8,000-9,000 years old making him of pre-Columbian origin (the period prior to Christopher Columbus’ voyages to the Americas). This sparked much dispute over the disposition of the skeletal remains.

Native American tribes, inhabiting the region where Kennewick Man was found, believed Kennewick man was a likely ancestor and requested possession of his remains in order to hold a reburial. However, scientists still speculated about the ancestry and affiliations of Kennewick Man, so a more detailed study was commissioned.

Rejecting a hypothesis

The study was published in 2014 and included isotopic, anatomical and morphometric analyses. It concluded that Kennewick Man resembled circumpacific populations, particularly the Japanese Ainu and Polynesians. It also claimed that he had certain “European-like morphological” traits, reinforcing the assertion that he was anatomically distinct from modern Native Americans.

Crucially, the 2014 study did not include DNA analysis. This prompted a new study led by Lundbeck Foundation Professor Eske Willerslev from the Centre for GeoGenetics at University of Copenhagen, and an Associate Editor of GHEG. It used advanced technologies to compare the genome sequence of Kennewick Man to genome wide data of contemporary human populations across the world. The results showed that modern Native Americans are the closest living relatives to Kennewick Man. The study further demonstrated that members of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation that belong to the Claimant Plateau tribes of the Pacific Northwest, who had originally claimed him as their ancestor, were one of the groups showing close affinities to Kennewick Man or at least to the population to which he belonged.

Technological advances were fundamental in understanding the mystery of the Kennewick Man and his origins, exemplifying the interplay between anthropology, population genetics and cultural history. The Kennewick Man may not have been put to his final rest yet – but the mystery surrounding his origins has.

 

The paper The Ancestry and Affiliation of Kennewick Man was published in the journal Nature on Thursday 18. June 2015.

Genetics tags: ancient DNA / Centre for GeoGenetics / Eske Willerslev / genetics / Kennewick Man / Morten Rasmussen / Native Americans

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

  • Rethinking clinical outcome markers in multimorbidity
  • ICPD 25: accelerating the promise or just holding ground?
  • Genomic studies in Africa: an opportunity to leverage existing observational data for causal inference
  • Most genetic studies use only white participants – this will lead to greater health inequality
  • RxScanner™: Making medicines safe globally

Archives

  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015

Categories

  • Capacity Building
  • Genetics
  • Global Health
  • Indigenous People
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Journal
  • Non-communicable Diseases
  • Technological advances

Tags

Africa antiretrovirals APCDR blood pressure Brown Capacity building Child health CRONICAS diabetes Ebola Electronic health records epidemiology genetic diversity genetics genomics GHEG global health H3Africa health systems HIV HIV/AIDS human health hypertension India Indigenous health infectious diseases intervention journal LMICs Longitudinal Population-Based studies Low- and middle-income countries Malaria Mental Health NCDs PacBio populations Pregnancy Sandhu Sierra Leone South Africa sub-saharan Africa Women in Global Health World AIDS Day Zoonoses zoonotic
© Copyright 2015 Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press