Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics

An exciting new development from Cambridge Journals

Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics

A global code to counter ethics dumping in international research

Home / Genetics / A global code to counter ethics dumping in international research

A global code to counter ethics dumping in international research

Posted on
27 June 2019
by Kate Chatfield

Clinical studies in high income settings can struggle to recruit the target number of participants but for people in low income settings, enrolment in a clinical study may provide the only possible access to quality healthcare. In some situations, participation is used as a source of income generation, as occurs when healthy volunteers enrol in multiple trials, sometimes simultaneously [1]. When perceived benefits from participation in research are coupled with poverty-related issues such as illiteracy, low levels of medical comprehension, no access to legal systems for redress, and precarious local research governance structures, the risks for exploitation can be substantial.

‘Ethics dumping’ is the term used to describe research activities in foreign countries that would be prohibited in the researcher’s home country. Sometimes ethics dumping results from a deliberate attempt to exploit lower research governance standards; like when a scientist elects to conduct experiments on non-human primates in Kenya that would be illegal in their home EU country [2]. Or it might occur because of the researcher’s ignorance of local spiritual beliefs, customs or requirements in the foreign country; like when local beliefs about the sanctity of human blood mean that genetic screening which uses blood, may be viewed as an affront to the sacred aspects of life [3]. Whatever the cause, the result of ethics dumping is exploitation, and the risks for exploitation are not limited to individual participants. An EU-funded project, TRUST, identified 88 specific risks for the exploitation of individuals, communities, institutions, animals and environments [4].

Local communities can take measures to protect themselves against ethics dumping, like the San indigenous peoples of Southern Africa. Because of their unique genetic properties, the San are in high demand as a research population. Following a long history of exploitation, they developed the San Code of Research Ethics and now, researchers who wish to work with the San must adhere to this code.

However, we cannot rely simply upon actions at a local level to eradicate ethics dumping; global problems require global solutions. Hence, the primary aim of the TRUST project was to develop a global code of ethics that applies across all disciplines and focusses specifically on situations when researchers from high income settings undertake work in low- and middle-income countries.

The Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Settings (GCC) fills a niche which no other code has occupied before. It consists of 23 clear articles that help funders, researchers, communities and individuals to recognise and address potential ethical pitfalls. It emphasises that local communities must be involved in research in meaningful ways, right from the start, and that the end results must provide benefits locally. Any research that uses biological materials and associated information such as genetic sequence data should clarify to participants the potential monetary and non-monetary benefits that might arise, and a culturally appropriate plan to share benefits should be agreed to by all relevant stakeholders.

The GCC was recently adopted by the European Commission as a mandatory reference document for applicants to Europe’s biggest research fund: Horizon 2020 and the forthcoming Horizon Europe, ensuring its lasting impact on the practice of ethics dumping.

 

Dr Kate Chatfield is the Deputy Director for the Centre of Professional Ethics at the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan)

 

References

Bompart F, Healthy Volunteers for Clinical Trials in Resource-Poor Settings: National Registries Can Address Ethical and Safety Concerns, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2019, 28(1), 134-143.

Chatfield K, Morton D, The Use of Non-Human Primates in Research. In: Schroeder D et al. (eds) Ethics Dumping, SpringerBriefs in Research and Innovation Governance. Springer:Cham, 2018

Jegede AS, Culture and genetic screening in Africa, Developing world bioethics, 2009, 9(3), 128-137

Chatfield K et al., Generic Risks of Exporting Non-ethical Practices, a Report for TRUST. 2016; available at http://trust-project.eu/ deliverables-and-tools/RisksMatrix.

GeneticsGlobal HealthIndigenous People tags: Ethics / genetics / indigenous populations

Comments are closed.

Recent Posts

  • Rethinking clinical outcome markers in multimorbidity
  • ICPD 25: accelerating the promise or just holding ground?
  • Genomic studies in Africa: an opportunity to leverage existing observational data for causal inference
  • Most genetic studies use only white participants – this will lead to greater health inequality
  • RxScanner™: Making medicines safe globally

Archives

  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015

Categories

  • Capacity Building
  • Genetics
  • Global Health
  • Indigenous People
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Journal
  • Non-communicable Diseases
  • Technological advances

Tags

Africa antiretrovirals APCDR blood pressure Brown Capacity building Child health CRONICAS diabetes Ebola Electronic health records epidemiology genetic diversity genetics genomics GHEG global health H3Africa health systems HIV HIV/AIDS human health hypertension India Indigenous health infectious diseases intervention journal LMICs Longitudinal Population-Based studies Low- and middle-income countries Malaria Mental Health NCDs PacBio populations Pregnancy Sandhu Sierra Leone South Africa sub-saharan Africa Women in Global Health World AIDS Day Zoonoses zoonotic
© Copyright 2015 Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press